• 목록
• 답변
• 글쓰기
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제

Power Mobility and Safety Concerns

green power mobility mobility enhances participation in daily activities and recreation for those who are in long-term care. However, the devices could also pose safety risks which need to be addressed.

Instead of excluding residents who have certain diagnoses from green power mobility scooters near me mobility option as it could be viewed as risk management that is prejudicial, the majority of participants chose to take an approach based on teleology and let all residents trial a device.

Mobility

A green power mobility mobility device allows people who are disabled to move about their community or home and engage in daily activities that are otherwise unavailable to them. However, these devices could also pose a risk to the person using them, and other people who share their environment or space. Occupational therapists need to carefully assess each client's safety needs to make the best recommendations regarding powered mobility.

In an exploratory study (von Zweck, 1999), OTs from three residential care facilities within the Vancouver Coastal Health Authority conducted qualitative interviews with residents about their power mobility use. The objective was to establish a framework that would allow for a client-centered power movement prescription. The findings revealed four main themes: (1) the meaning of power mobility, (2) learning the rules of the road, (3) red flags: concerns about safety and (4) solutions.

Power mobility can enhance the quality of life of those with mobility limitations. This is because it lets them participate in everyday activities at home as well as in the community. Self-care, productive and recreational activities are essential to the physical and mental well-being of people who are older. For many who suffer from progressive diseases, power mobilty offers a way to participate in these vital activities.

It was considered unacceptable by the participants to remove a wheelchair from a resident's home because it would alter their life's narrative and direction and hinder them from engaging in the same things they did before their disease worsened. This was particularly true for those in Facility 1 who had only been able use their power chairs for a short period of time and were now reliant on others to push them.

Another potential solution was reducing the speed at which residents drove their chairs, but this could have raised concerns, including a lack of privacy and the impact on other residents in the community. The most drastic solution to safety concerns was to get rid of the wheelchair of a resident.

Safety

Power mobility lets people move more easily. They can also participate in a greater variety of activities, as well as complete errands. With the increased mobility comes an increased chance of accidents. For some, these incidents can cause serious injuries to themselves and others. It is important to consider the safety of your clients before suggesting the use of power mobility.

The first step in assessing safety is to determine if your client can safely operate their power wheelchair or scooter. This could include an assessment of physical health by a doctor or occupational therapist or a mobility specialist, depending on the nature of your client's disability and their current health. In some cases your client will require an automobile lift to be capable of loading and unloading the device at their home, workplace or community.

Another aspect of safety is to learn the rules of the road. This includes sharing space with other pedestrians, wheelchair users and bus drivers. A majority of the participants mentioned this theme.

For some this, it required learning to use their wheelchairs on sidewalks, instead of driving through busy areas or over curbs (unless specifically designed for doing such). For others, it meant driving more slow in a crowded area and keeping an eye out for people walking.

The last and least preferred option of removing a person's wheelchair, was seen as a double whammy that would result in the loss of mobility and preventing them from taking part in the activities of the community and facilities. Diane and Harriet among others were among those who had their chairs taken away.

Other solutions that were suggested by participants included educating other residents staff, family members and other residents about the safety of power mobility. This could include teaching the basics of driving (such as the correct side to walk on in the hallway) as well as encouraging residents to practice driving skills when they go outside and assisting them to be aware of how their actions affect the mobility of other people.

Follow-Up

The ability of a child and their willingness to be a part of the world can be profoundly affected by a device for power mobility - xs.xylvip.com,. Yet there isn't much research about the experience of children who are learning to use this equipment. This study uses a post-previous design to examine the effects of 6 months of using one of the four early mobility devices on a group of school-aged children of children with severe cerebral Palsy (CP).

Qualitative interviews were conducted with 15 parents and children's occupational and physical therapists. Thematic analysis revealed three major themes. The first theme, 'Power for Mobility', described how the use of an electric device impacted more than just locomotor abilities. The experience of learning how to drive a motorized mobility device is often an emotional and transformative one.

The second theme, 'There isn't a cookbook,' revealed that learning to utilize the green power electric mobility scooter mobility device was an individual process that developed over time in a cyclical fashion. Therapists were asked to determine what was realistic in light of the child's capabilities and needs. In the initial phase of training and after, therapists had to be patient with children as well as parents. A number of parents and therapists emphasized the need to assist families celebrate their successes and work through issues that arise during the training process.

The third theme, "Shared space", explored how the use a power device can impact the lives of others. The majority of participants in this study believed that people should be mindful when using a power mobility device. This was especially true when driving in public spaces. Many participants also reported that they've had to deal with instances where another's property was damaged due to the use of an greenpower electric scooters mobility device, or in which an individual was injured due to a driver who failed to yield right-of-way.

Overall, the results of this study suggest that short-term power mobility and socialization training is feasible for preschoolers with CP in certain classroom settings. Future research should continue to investigate the effects of training and results of this kind of intervention for young children with CP. This could lead to more standardized training protocols for children suffering from CP.