• 목록
• 답변
• 글쓰기
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제

4) That it isn't enough t show that the loss might have been the results of negligence on the a part of the collector. On the close of the plaintiff's case, the defendant requested the court docket to direct a verdict for him, on the bottom that, the motion being one for private negligence, the plaintiff had not brought house to the collector personally any connection with the trunk at the time it was destroyed; and that, if any negligence was to be imputed to the subordinate officers of the customs, such negligence could not be imputed to the collector. 5) That the jury cannot find a verdict in favor of the plaintiff in the event that they find that the lack of this trunk was on account of the non-public negligence, or violation of statutes or regulations, on the part of the customs officers aside from the defendant personally. September, 1883. The proof being closed, the defendant moved the court docket to direct a verdict in his favor upon the identical grounds on which the movement was made on the shut of the plaintiff's case; that is to say, that there was no proof in the case to connect the defendant with the destruction of the trunk; that, in the case of a public officer, the doctrine of legislation, respondeat superior, did not apply; and that, earlier than there might be any recovery from the public officer, it must be proven that he was personally responsible himself, and that the negligence was his own act.

On the shut of 1916 several banks, trust companies, and commercial and industrial establishments made particular Christmas presents to their workers to compensate partially for the lowered purchasing power of their salaries for the previous year, the presents being a set proportion of the salaries. Evidence was then introduced on the a part of the defendant tending to point out that the inspector on the dock who examined the trunk found what, in the train of his discretion, he decided to be dutiable articles; that he reported to his superior officer that he thought the trunk contained dutiable articles, and that officer advised him to see what else he could discover; that he found different dutiable articles; that he tried to find an appraiser to appraise and assess duties upon those articles, however didn't discover one; that he reported to the staff officer having charge of the passengers and their baggage from that steamer, and, underneath his advice, marked the trunk for the public store, to be examined by the proper examiner, and have the duties assessed, under a section of the rules for the federal government of officers of the customs underneath the superintendence and course of the surveyor سعر الدولار اليوم في البنك الأهلي المصري of the port of new York, which was admitted in proof, and was as follows: 'In the absence of the entry clerks or appraiser, dutiable articles taken from passengers' baggage can be sent by the inspector, as quickly as possible, to the public store, and the passenger can be furnished by the inspector with the standard baggage certificate;' that, the trunk having been thus marked for the general public store, and a receipt given to the plaintiff, it was put into the charge of the discharging officers of the vessel; that the inspectors have been allowed to ship goods to the public store for appraisement solely by a custom-home cartman; that the discharging officer who acquired the plaintiff's trunk did not send it to the shop-home, because there was no cartman on the pier to take it away, and none got here to do so, although an effort was made to obtain one; that the trunk remained on the pier underneath his custody, and was completely consumed by fire on the evening of the thirty first of January,-the officers who had been there being pushed away by the flames; and that the hearth occurred between 2 and three o'clock A. M. of the day following that of the arrival of the steamer.

117. In the absence of the entry clerk or appraiser, dutiable articles taken from passengers' baggage will likely be despatched by the inspector, as soon as possible, to the appraiser's store, and the passenger might be furnished by the inspector with the same old 'baggage certificate,' which will probably be in the next type: Inspector's certificate of goods sent to public store beneath baggage permit. She made a baggage declaration, under oath, which acknowledged that she had two trunks and two luggage, containing 'sporting apparel in precise use and private effects not merchandise.' She declared 'nothing new or dutiable.' Her baggage was examined on the dock, and one trunk was detained by the customs officers, who gave her a receipt therefor, signed by an inspector, which said that the inspector had sent the one trunk, for appraisement, to the general public retailer, under a baggage permit. It additionally appeared in proof that, underneath article 431 of the customs laws, it was the duty of the collector, on the arrival of any steamer of a regular line from a overseas port, to element an experienced entry clerk, who, with an analogous clerk to be designated by the naval officer, and an assistant appraiser or examiner to be detailed by the appraiser, should, together with the inspector on board, look at all of the passengers' baggage, سعر الدولار اليوم في البنك الأهلي place the dutiable worth upon the same, and, if dutiable articles had been discovered, appraise the same, and assess the responsibility thereon.

13) That the directions devolved upon the customs officials on the vessel a discretion to determine whether the amount and number of the dutiable articles was such that the proper classification and examination for appraisement thereof could not be made at the vessel, and, in the event that they determined it could not be, to ship the trunk and its contents to the public retailer for appraisement. 11) That it appears by the evidence in this case that one of the directions by the secretary for the steering of the officers at the vessel by which the plaintiff's trunk got here, was a provision that, every time any trunk or package deal introduced by a passenger as baggage contains articles topic to responsibility, the worth whereof exceeds 5 hundred dollars, or, if the quantity or number of dutiable articles is such that the proper classification and examination for appraisement thereof can't be made, the trunk or bundle shall be sent to the general public retailer for appraisement. 1877.' 'Art. 104. Whenever any trunk or bundle brought by a passenger as baggage contains articles subject to obligation, and the worth thereof exceeds $500, or if the quantity or variety of the dutiable articles is such that a correct examination, classification, or appraisement thereof can't be made at the vessel, the trunk or bundle shall be sent to the public retailer for appraisement.' 'Art.

If you loved this article so you would like to receive more info pertaining to سعر الدولار اليوم في البنك الأهلي المصري nicely visit our webpage.